Basic Income gave recipients the chance to plan ahead

By Mike Puffer

There’s certainly been a large amount of attention paid to the Province’s decision to end the Basic Income Pilot program early next year, rather than seeing the plan through fully to its original three-year time period. As one of three Ontario communities selected for the program, the City of Kawartha Lakes has hundreds of residents currently receiving the guaranteed income payments.

Recently, members of Community Care’s health care team met with two clients who are Basic Income recipients. We heard their stories of how the program was making a bit of a positive difference for them and their families. Their willingness to share their stories was appreciated.

Their testimonials, along with many others that have been heard since the summer, when the Province announced that the program would be closed early, illustrate how Basic Income recipients were starting to experience turnarounds for the better in their lifestyles.

For example, a Lindsay resident was able to leave an abusive relationship as a result of having a bit more guaranteed income. A woman who has chosen casual employment over more regular work in order to be at home to help her challenged child was finding that the program helped with food and clothing costs for her kids. Another person was feeling good about herself, had quit smoking, was purchasing healthier food for her family and had even launched a spirituality group – something she had always wanted to do in order to help others as well as herself.

Community Care has observed that some clients who are Basic Income recipients have improved their health and lifestyles in many ways. They are eating better, are happier, and have been making fewer appointments to see health care specialists such as those at our Community Health Centre. These are all positive ways that the program was helping and saving the health care system in the long run.

A common theme that’s emerged from many stories about the pilot participants has been their ability to look ahead – to actually put future plans in place. Now, the sustainability of such advancements for residents, along with what lies ahead for them since the program is slated to come to an end in March 2019, are unknown.

That ability to look ahead – to plan – was one very real aspect of the Basic Income program. We continue to follow the government’s intentions once the program is cancelled with great interest and considerable concern for local residents who were starting to turn some corners in their lives as a result of the support they were receiving.


  1. Joan Abernethy says:

    We already have all the data we need. One more pilot with its administrative costs is not going to help any but the few whose applications were approved while the rest of Canada’s underclass continue to suffer in silence. Petition Trudeau to introduce federal GI law to be administered by Canada Revenue Agency automatically based on income tax returns. That is the fix. Make it a right for all not a privilege for the few.

  2. What’s better than an unconditional basic income of $X/week? A punitive #VacancyTax / #VacantLandTax, which property owners are so keen to *avoid* that it reduces rents by $X/week. Why is this better? Because:
    (1) Nobody asks where the money is going to come from. (Even the punitive tax, in order to do its job, doesn’t need to raise any revenue.)
    (2) By definition, the benefit of lower rents doesn’t disappear in higher rents (as all increases in welfare spending tend to do).
    (3) Avoidance of the punitive tax generates job-creating activity; and the resulting lower rents (commercial and residential) make it easier for employers to pay workers enough to live on.
    (4) If this policy doesn’t serve all the purposes of a basic income, it reduces the size and cost of the basic income needed to serve the remaining purposes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.